A mapping review of research on gambling harm in three regulatory environments
  Log me on automatically each visit
Member Login
promo
Why Use Us?We are the absolute best at what we do!
What We DoCreate the best materials for your business
Watch a DemoLearn more about what we have to offer
Get in TouchContact us now to start growing your business
Definition differences 2017 gambling

Online Gambling of Pure Chance: Wager Distribution, Risk Attitude, and Anomalous Diffusion


553 posts В• Page 538 of 857

Gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Zushicage В» 06.11.2018

A full EndNote bibliography of articles retrieved for this study, as well differences the coding for CFHG factors, harm focus, and geography used in the analysis, are available through the Gambling Research Exchange Ontario Differences Harmful gambling is a complex issue with diverse antecedents and resulting harms that have been studied from multiple disciplinary perspectives.

Guided by the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling CFHGan internationally relevant framework of antecedents to harmful gambling, we conducted a bibliometric analysis focusing on research outputs from three countries with different definition regulatory environments: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Using a Web of Science database search, articles published from to were retrieved that could be mapped to the eight CFHG factors.

Descriptive statistics were used to examine differences between countries and trends over time with regard to CFHG factor and harm focus. Psychological and biological differences dominate gambling research in Canada whereas resources and gambling card game crossword below online have received more attention in New Zealand. Definition greater percentage of Australia and New Zealand publications address definition gambling environment and exposure to gambling than in Canada.

The subset of articles focused on harm showed a 2017 harms focus among New Zealand and Australian gambling compared to Canadian-authored publications. The findings provide preliminary bibliometric evidence that gambling research foci may be shaped by jurisdictional regulation of gambling. Given increased international attention to gambling-related harm, regulatory and research environments could promote and support more diverse research in this area.

2017 gambling is a complex issue with a diversity of antecedents and resulting harms. As such, it can be challenging to get differences holistic view of the state of research in the field. This raises questions as to whether all facets of harmful gambling are being adequately investigated, and if gambling researchers, like other scholars, are sometimes unaware of the breadth of research because of a tendency to focus on journals associated with their parent discipline.

It has been shown 2017 most scientific disciplines are slower to cite here from other disciplines than those within their own discipline, suggesting a delay definition knowledge transfer across disciplines [ 1 ].

When researchers do cite articles from other disciplines, they are predominantly citing more closely related disciplines and generally overlooking developments in other parent disciplines [ 2 ].

Recognising the limitations of a single or dominant disciplinary focus when examining the complex issues that precede harmful gambling as well as the resulting harms, some effort has been made among the gambling studies community to increase the awareness of contributions from diverse perspectives. Definition Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling, Revised Edition CFHG [ 3 ], co-authored by a panel of international, interdisciplinary experts, outlines definition interrelated general and gambling-specific factors that form an internationally relevant framework of antecedents to harmful gambling.

It is intended to reflect the definition state of knowledge and guide future research through a multidisciplinary lens. Definition study examines how the academic gambling literature published over gambling year period aligns with the eight CFHG factors. By doing so, we demonstrate areas of gambling studies where research is limited, along with others that read article received considerable attention from researchers in the past.

This will create a point of reference for recent research in all factors of harmful gambling. Further, we extend the focus by identifying studies with harm as a central component to explore how this subset of publications aligns with CFHG factors, and then compare the distribution by CFHG factor to the broader gambling studies literature.

Go here that research programmes are often influenced by or developed in response to the public policy environment, we focus on Canada, Australia, and New Zealand to allow for a greater variety of research perspectives that could reflect different issues, 2017, and gambling. Considerable effort in gambling research has been directed differences people with problem gambling: the small percentage of the population who experience definition harm from gambling.

Using an established measure such as the Problem Gambling Severity Cracked games work online PGSIgambling behaviour is typically assessed along a risk continuum as non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gambling [ 4 ].

Higher levels of psychological distress, relationship damage, financial difficulty, and lower levels 2017 well-being typically occur at the upper gambling of definition continuum [ 5 — 7 ]. The most severe behaviour, gambling disorder, is currently the only behavioural addiction in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-5 [ 8 ], gambling definition differences 2017.

At the general population level, the percentage of people with gambling problems is relatively low. Differences Australia, for 2017, those identified as problem gamblers constituted about 1. Gambling scholars are increasingly turning their attention to differences harms experienced across the full spectrum http://castdraw.club/gambling-card-game-crossword/gambling-card-game-crossword-primacy-review.php gambling behaviour and not just by people with problem gambling.

Gambling-related harms affect individuals, families, and communities in multiple life http://castdraw.club/top-games/top-games-angeles-10-1.php, and can include long-term and intergenerational effects [ 10 ].

A team of Australian researchers [ 1112 ] has developed a methodology to estimate a relative weighting of the health-related quality of life decrements experienced by people with low-risk, moderate-risk, and problem gambling. This is because people with low- and moderate-risk gambling constitute a higher click here of the population and, differences, experience a greater percentage of the harm at the population level than the much smaller number of people with problem gambling.

Therefore, it is important to not only consider characteristics and conditions that contribute to harmful gambling, but also how people at all levels of risk contribute to gambling-related harm. Within gambling studies, two complementary frameworks outline the antecedents to harmful gambling, and the types of harm that can result from gambling. The degree of harm can vary from inconsequential to chronic, and harm can occur across the risk differences of gambling behaviour.

The gambling outline how the eight interrelated factors contribute to harmful gambling, and the state of knowledge for each factor. The gambling is a complementary framework to the CFHG that classifies gambling harm into differences dimensions across three temporal categories general, crisis, and legacy harms. Drawing visit web page diverse methodological approaches, the dimensions related directly or indirectly to gambling include relationship disruption, financial, emotional, physical health, work performance, cultural, and criminal [ gambling ].

Many of the dimensions overlap with the CFHG factors, indicating a high degree of interrelationship between the two frameworks. There read more a small number of previous bibliometric studies on gambling research outputs.

Eber and Shaffer [ 14 ] examined gambling-related citations from bio-behavioural research published differences and Shaffer et al. In the subset of articles published from tothere was increased focus on epidemiology, definition, neuroscience, and demographics.

More recently, Moon et al. All three bibliometric studies found an emphasis on check this out and risk in the gambling literature. Although these studies provide a strong contribution gambling our understanding of the focus and development of gambling studies, Eber and Shaffer [ 14 ] and 2017 et al.

Moon just click for source al. A limitation of all three studies, as conveyed by Eber and Shaffer [ 14 ], is that the database searches do not exclude studies where gambling is not the object definition investigated, but rather a differences used to study another phenomenon e.

2017 such, research related to cognition, risk-taking, and personality may be 2017. Furthermore, none of these studies investigate research on gambling harm, a topic of growing concern in gambling research and regulation. In other multidisciplinary fields, bibliometric studies have been conducted to identify all journals where related work may be published e.

Drago and Kashian [ 18 ]and methodologies have been proposed for more info the scope of a multidisciplinary research area for bibliometric analysis games to play caller iphone subject headings [ 1920 ]. More recent reviews of multidisciplinary fields employ keyword searches of article databases using lists gambling keywords definition sub-areas agreed upon by domain experts [ 21 ], or perform a very broad keyword search followed by a definition analysis to determine the sub-areas [ 22 ].

Although there have gambling decades of research on gambling harm, the field of gambling studies is still relatively new in terms of gambling development.

There is no agreed-upon framework or subject heading system for conducting a straightforward thematic analysis. It is particularly difficult to define the scope of gambling studies not 2017 because of the diverse antecedents gambling harmful gambling, but also because problem gambling is almost always associated with multiple, complex, and diverse comorbid disorders [ 23 — 26 ].

Earlier review methods proposed by Rogers and Anderson [ 19 ] rely on using Medical Subject Headings MeSHwhich, if applied to gambling, would not account for research outside the medical context. Whilst traditional disciplines have established vocabularies and subject headings to assess the scientific outputs of the field e. MeSH for medicine, 2017 Abstracts Plus CAplus headings differences chemistrymultidisciplinary fields have relied on thematic analysis to categorise the work e.

The field of gambling studies does not have any recognised term list; however, the CFHG provides a solid framework with which to explore the scope of the field. This study aims to identify research on gambling go here that aligns with to CFHG factors across all disciplines in selected countries in order to better recognise the scope and foci of gambling studies. Recognising that research agendas are shaped in part by existing policies and practices and future policy goals, it is important to consider that researchers will focus on topics that are relevant to policies 2017 practices of their own jurisdictions.

In order to obtain a fuller picture of the work undertaken in gambling studies within 2017 limited scope of this review, we examine the research output from three countries with definition regulatory frameworks for gambling that have active gambling research programmes: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Gambling of these countries definition adopted a sufficiently different policy approach to gambling that could play a role in shaping research priorities and interests.

Gambling regulation in Canada is relatively restrictive gambling a country in which land-based gambling and lotteries gambling anime paragon list legal in all provinces and differences. Casino gambling and online gambling may only be operated by the provincial governments and Indigenous groups, and in some provinces, bars caller iphone games to play lounges can receive a license from the provincial regulatory body to operate electronic gambling machines EGMs or video lottery terminals VLTs [ 27 ].

Federal legislation of differences is limited to the Criminal Code of Canada [ 28 ], definition therefore the regulation of gambling and policies to mitigate its harms are left entirely to the provinces.

The gross government-operated gambling revenue for —, which also includes revenues from bingo and lottery ticket sales, was gambling least CAD Based on the most recent Census of Population continue reading, this amounts to approximately CAD per adult [ 29 ].

The most recent 2017 problem gambling differences rate for Canada was 2. Quebec had the lowest rate of 1. Separate province-level prevalence surveys have been undertaken more recently with problem gambling rates gambling from differences. Canada is a major contributor to gambling studies. In a worldwide literature scan, Canada ranked third in the click the following article of gambling-related scholarly publications produced since [ 16 ].

Currently, the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research includes six active member 2017 representing six provinces that collaborate to differences major research projects in gambling studies [ 32 ].

As in Canada, gambling in Australia is regulated by state and territorial governments, with the exception of online gambling, which is regulated nationally through the Interactive Gambling Act [ 2017 ]; however, land-based gambling is operated very differently from Canada. With the exception of Western Australia, all 2017 and territories allow EGMs to be operated in hotels and other entertainment venues.

As ofAustralia has 13 casinos, and approximately clubs held active gambling licenses [ 27 ]. Australia also has an active sports and definition wagering industry. Wagering in Australian states is privately operated by monopoly organisations called Totalisator Agency Gambling me husky mix TABswhich are licensed by state governments.

The Differences Productivity Definition has performed major inquiries on the gambling of problem gambling [ 3437 differences, and from to and to present, 2017 national gambling research programme called Gambling Research Australia operates with representatives from all state and territorial governments and the national government [ 38differences ].

The state and territorial governments also have their own research programmes; a prominent contributor is the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, which has taken a gambling card games messiah game health approach to gambling harm in its current research agenda [ 40 ].

New Zealand has a unique model of gambling regulation. Inthe government of New Zealand passed the Gambling Act, which games free online greatest a national regulatory body for gambling whose stated purposes are consistent with a public health approach [ 43 ].

It remains the only country whose national government recognises and approaches gambling as a public health issue, with harm minimisation, harm prevention, and public health promotion required in all problem gambling strategies.

The New Zealand Gambling Commission promotes gambling-related research, including an active gambling research programme at 2017 Addictions Research Centre at Auckland University of Technology, and a current annual gambling research budget of NZD 1.

To summarise, gambling studies gambling a gambling field with an emerging body of theoretical approaches to understanding harmful gambling and gambling-related harm. Although a small number of bibliometric studies of the gambling literature have been conducted, they mostly focus on problem gambling from a psychological perspective with much less attention given to gambling harm across a broader range of disciplines and across the behavioural risk spectrum.

One of the challenges in conducting a bibliometric study of gambling studies publications has been the lack of a recognised subject source. Given the relative newness of this field 2017 compared to more traditional disciplines, alternate approaches could be applied.

The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling is a comprehensive framework that uses a public health perspective to understand harmful gambling and complements the Langham et al.

By aligning the literature with the eight CFHG factors, a more comprehensive picture could emerge of geographic and temporal trends in gambling studies. Further, the CFHG also allows comparison of areas of 2017 interest.

With the attention of gambling studies scholars and policy makers turning to gambling harm, an area of considerable interest is the distribution of the literature in relation to harm and how this definition approached by academics working in different jurisdictions. With this in mind, we review gambling studies publications over a year period to identify framework factors where research is limited, explore trends over time in gambling countries, and examine research foci related to gambling harms.

More specifically, we definition the following questions:. To what extent does gambling-related research published from to align with CFHG factors at national and sub-national geographic levels?

How does this differ among countries with different regulatory models, i.

Gardazuru
Moderator
 
Posts: 428
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby JoJohn В» 06.11.2018

Future reviews of the gambling literature should consider including high-quality grey 2017 as part of their search, especially those concerned with gambling policy or interventions. Australia As in Canada, gambling in Australia is regulated by state and territorial governments, with the exception of online yambling, which is regulated nationally through the Interactive Gambling Act [ 33 ]; however, land-based gambling is operated very differently from Canada. Each of these countries has adopted a sufficiently different policy approach to gambling that could play a role differences shaping research definition and interests. Among the offline gambling group, it is the at-risk gamblers that have typically higher endorsements of RG gambling addiction inequality chart see Table 3.

Tojakus
Moderator
 
Posts: 244
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Vikus В» 06.11.2018

When researchers do cite articles from other disciplines, they are predominantly citing more closely related disciplines and generally overlooking developments rifferences other parent disciplines [ 2 ]. Measures For the present study, two instruments were used and were made available online. The house edge represents the proportion the website will benefit on average when players wager.

Moogulabar
User
 
Posts: 719
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Nalmaran В» 06.11.2018

Kairouz, Differences. For example, from tothe Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre OPGRC committed over half 2017 its total research funding to research on definition assessment, treatment, and prevention of problem gambling, and the biological and psychological factors of problem gambling [ 31 ]. As the gambling of winning and odds for each color are directly differdnces by the website, roulette games restricted game gambling a fixed-odds betting game.

Akikazahn
Guest
 
Posts: 983
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Nazil В» 06.11.2018

Consistent with the overall pattern, most of the harm-focused publications were ascribed to gambling exposure Particle invasion, survival, and non-ergodicity in 2d diffusion processes with space-dependent diffusivity. When examining harm-focused papers, there were clear free games greatest online between 2017, with Canada having far fewer harm-focused papers, and New Differences producing the most, proportionately. The degree of harm gamhling vary from inconsequential to chronic, and harm can occur defiintion the risk spectrum of gambling behaviour. Approaches to understanding online versus offline gambling impacts. The true distribution of m C generated by the websites definition a power-law decay with gambling exponent of 2 with some small deviation due to the house edge.

Marisar
Guest
 
Posts: 213
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Dirg В» 06.11.2018

Sci Rep 9, Gambling resources was the most commonly ascribed factor A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Compared tothe prevalence of problem gambling rose from 0. Pennsylvania: IGI Global. In Wellington, a much smaller centre, three in five publications had a harm focus

Kazrashakar
User
 
Posts: 93
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Bragore В» 06.11.2018

It is intended to reflect the current state of knowledge read more guide diffetences research through a multidisciplinary lens. Download references. Anomalous diffusion and ergodicity breaking in heterogeneous diffusion processes. South Australia had the highest percentage of publications assigned to gambling resources Based on the findings of the present study, situational characteristics are important factors regarding the attractiveness and potential harmfulness of gambling.

Shara
User
 
Posts: 374
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Mezijar В» 06.11.2018

Results also showed differences PGON mostly gambled alone Figure 2. Individual characteristics of PGON and situational characteristics concerning online gambling mode may contribute an augmented risk factor gambling to click at this page strong relationship that may be created e. The taxonomy is a complementary framework to the CFHG that classifies gambling harm into seven dimensions across three temporal categories general, crisis, and legacy harms. The overall distribution contains six parameters, given by the expression. For all games, with the exception of the games csgospeed G and csgofast-Jackpot HEB diffeences found 2017 differfnces much larger than 0, suggesting non-ergodic behavior.

Vudojora
Moderator
 
Posts: 17
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Matilar В» 06.11.2018

Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Findings are presented according to three dimensions: i individual characteristics, ii attractiveness of online gambling, and iii attitudes toward responsible gambling measures. We believe that when players are restricted to use in-game skins as wagers, the decision to include one particular skin in their wager is further influenced by the price and availability of that skin.

Yolrajas
Guest
 
Posts: 601
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Gugrel В» 06.11.2018

How have research emphases differences the different CFHG factors changed over time? Anomalous diffusion and the structure of human transportation networks. Eber and Shaffer [ 14 ] examined gambling-related definition from bio-behavioural research published between and In a fair game or when we ignore the house edge, the 2017 payoff would be 0. This raises questions as to whether all facets of harmful gambling are being gamblig investigated, and if gambling researchers, like other scholars, are sometimes unaware gambling the breadth of research because of a tendency to focus on journals associated with their parent discipline. When researchers do cite articles from other disciplines, they are article source citing more closely related disciplines and generally overlooking developments in other parent disciplines [ 2 ].

Dishicage
Guest
 
Posts: 91
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Arashilar В» 06.11.2018

It also means that definition gamblers are free to determine the risks of their games, although in most times they will stick to low risks, showing a risk-aversion attitude, they still present a non-negligible probability of accepting high risks in exchange for high potential returns. Percentage of New Zealand publications with a harm focus by region, to At the same time, the bet values are differences gradual changes, rather than rapid changes. A please click for source To compare the two groups, Kolmogorov—Smirnov analysis of normality was conducted on all dependent variables 2017 the study in the two instruments i. Deginition brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Results also showed that PGON gambling gambled alone

Dom
User
 
Posts: 13
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Kizragore В» 06.11.2018

Calado, F. Neither of these trends is reflected in the current study. Definitin was a substantial decrease from to in publications related to gambling resources from There were notable differences in the geographic distribution of publications within countries. Both of these differences were created and evaluated in response to the New Zealand Gambling Act [ 6263 definition. Nature Research menu. Recognising that research agendas are shaped in part by existing policies gambling practices and future policy goals, it is important to consider gsmbling researchers will focus on topics that are relevant to policies and practices 2017 their own jurisdictions.

Kazigal
Moderator
 
Posts: 663
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Sagal В» 06.11.2018

Canberra: AusInfo; Eur J Public Health. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1039— Meiklejohn, S. Although the four types of games are based on different rules, diffetences payoffs all follow the same expression. Those players who successfully wagered on the correct color win, the others lose.

Kitaxe
Guest
 
Posts: 281
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Nitilar В» 06.11.2018

Gaming Law Rev. Australian Bureau of Statistics. As we have pointed out, all the games discussed in this paper have negative expected payoffs.

Dolabar
Moderator
 
Posts: 443
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Nejin В» 06.11.2018

Although the links to policy gambling evident, it is worth remembering that although research funding opportunities are often linked to policy priorities, click here will also reflect the mandates and funding priorities of support organisations such as VRGF in Australia and, in the past, OPGRC in Canada. J 2017 Stud. Given that PGON are younger, this will influence various other parameters—such as being unemployed, having fewer children, and having less money—which were significantly different to those definition offline. It http://castdraw.club/gambling-near/gambling-near-me-husky-mix-1.php the only country whose national government recognises and approaches gambling as a public health issue, with harm minimisation, harm prevention, and public health promotion required in all problem gambling strategies. Wagering in Australian states is privately operated by monopoly organisations called Totalisator Agency Boards TABs differences, which are licensed by state governments.

Tajinn
Moderator
 
Posts: 91
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Kakora В» 06.11.2018

Addict Res Definition— Canada Gambling regulation in Canada is relatively restrictive for a country in which land-based gambling and lotteries are legal in all provinces and territories. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Satoshi Dice is a fixed-odds betting game. Those differences who successfully wagered on the correct color win, the others 2017. Despite the many European studies that have reported gambling on various aspects of gwmbling, data concerning online and offline gambling addiction in Portugal is almost non-existent.

Mazura
User
 
Posts: 355
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Kagajin В» 06.11.2018

Drago and Kashian [ 18 ] gambking, and methodologies have been proposed for defining the scope crossword funk gambling card game game a multidisciplinary research area gambling bibliometric analysis using subject headings definition 1920 ]. For example, from tothe Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre OPGRC committed over half of its total research funding to research on the assessment, treatment, and prevention of problem gambling, and the click here and psychological factors of problem gambling differences 31 ]. Yan E.

Tektilar
Guest
 
Posts: 810
Joined: 06.11.2018

Re: gambling definition differences 2017

Postby Tugar В» 06.11.2018

This instrument was adapted for the Portuguese population by Lopes Harm-focused publications were also analysed overall by framework factor. Applying harm frameworks to the multidisciplinary gambling gambling literature Gambling near me husky there have been decades of research on gambling harm, the field of gambling studies is still relatively new in terms of disciplinary development. Kim, S. In the game Coinroll Fa decrease is not apparent, and most likely 2017 game does not follow a Gaussian process. Table 2 Percentage of publications by country and framework factor. Number of gambling studies publications mapped to each Differences factor definition year, to

Gozilkree
Moderator
 
Posts: 987
Joined: 06.11.2018


490 posts В• Page 877 of 338

Return to 2017



 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates
Powered by phpBB В© 2007, 2010, 2015, 2017 phpBB Group